|
|
|
|
cherylpf
crazy cat lady
|
|
|
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 17304
|
| Back to top
|
|
 Posted: 06/28/05 - 09:50 Post subject: hypothetically
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Jenn
Fresh, Hot & Wild
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 7935
Location: Suite 550
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/28/05 - 09:51 Post subject:
I think it's wrong if you don't pay for it. Sorry pffff.
Do you pay a monthly fee to just download and listen and then pay extra to burn?
|
|
|
|
|
cherylpf
crazy cat lady
|
|
|
Joined: 14 May 2002
Posts: 17304
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/28/05 - 10:00 Post subject:
I agree, but sometimes its hard to find some music too even pay for it. Other times its nice to hear some music before paying $14 for the whole cd. And I realize I'm not the norm but I usually do buy the cd eventually of artists I like, and those I don't I delete the files. I understand the ruling and why its fair, but I still don't like the music industry.
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Jenn
Fresh, Hot & Wild
|
|
|
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Posts: 7935
Location: Suite 550
|
| Back to top
|
|
Posted: 06/28/05 - 10:13 Post subject:
| cherylpf wrote: | | I agree, but sometimes its hard to find some music too even pay for it. Other times its nice to hear some music before paying $14 for the whole cd. And I realize I'm not the norm but I usually do buy the cd eventually of artists I like, and those I don't I delete the files. I understand the ruling and why its fair, but I still don't like the music industry. |
Quite a few artists will have their latest CD uploaded on their website for our listening pleasure. Ok...well I know of 2 for sure.
I also paid $9/month to AOL Music Match (thank god I don't have AOL anymore) and I could download/listen to unlimited songs. They were still $1 a piece to burn. They had a pretty good library.
|
|
|
|
